1994 Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Case Law

Opinions 1 - 500 of 3006

Daniel J. Podberesky, Plaintiff-appellant, v. William E. Kirwan, President of the University of Marylandat College Park; University of Maryland at College Park(umcp); Monica Green; Maudlyn George, on Her Own Behalfand on Behalf of Her Daughter Allison George; Eileen Heath;richard A. Dalgetty; Gerard W. Henry; Maisha Herren;aletha S. Mcrae, on Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of Herdaughter Daletha Mcrae; Charles L. Smith, Iii, on His Ownbehalf and on Behalf of His Son Charles Smith, Iv,defendants-appellees,equal Opportunity Foundation; American Council Oneducation; Mexican-american Legal Defense and Educationfund; William Julius Wilson, Doctor; Association for Thestudy of Afro-american Life and History; Lawyers' Committeefor Civil Rights Under Law; United States of America, Amici Curiae.daniel J. Podberesky, Plaintiff-appellant, v. William E. Kirwan, President of the University of Marylandat College Park; University of Maryland at College Park(umcp); Monica Green; Maudlyn George, on Her Own Behalfand on Behalf of Her Daughter Allison George; Eileen Heath;richard A. Dalgetty; Gerard W. Henry; Maisha Herren;aletha S. Mcrae, on Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of Herdaughter Daletha Mcrae; Charles L. Smith, Iii, on His Ownbehalf and on Behalf of His Son Charles Smith, Iv,defendants-appellees,equal Opportunity Foundation; American Council Oneducation; Mexican-american Legal Defense and Educationfund; William Julius Wilson, Doctor; Association for Thestudy of Afro-american Life and History; Lawyers' Committeefor Civil Rights Under Law; United States of America, Amici Curiae
Date: December 30, 1994
Citation: 46 F.3d 5
In Re: Benjamin H. Jones, Petitioner
Date: December 22, 1994
Citation: 45 F.3d 426
In Re: Michael Rankins, Petitioner
Date: December 22, 1994
Citation: 45 F.3d 427
In Re: Rose Mary Wiggins Beverly, Petitioner
Date: December 22, 1994
Citation: 45 F.3d 425
Tyrone Thomas, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Marie Baxter, Defendant Appellee
Date: December 20, 1994
Citation: 43 F.3d 1468
In Re William D. Zack, Petitioner Appellant
Date: December 16, 1994
Citation: 43 F.3d 1470
Norfolk & Western Railway Company, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Accident & Casualty Insurance Company of Winterthur;insurance Company of Florida; Southern American Insurancecompany; Northwestern National Insurance Company Ofmilwaukee; Bellefonte Insurance Company; California Unioninsurance Company; the Insurance Company of North America;employers Insurance of Wausau; American Reinsurancecompany; Yosemite Insurance Company; General Reinsurancecorporation; United National Insurance Company; Protectivenational Insurance Company; Central National Insurancecompany of Omaha; American Centennial Insurance Company;first State Insurance Company; Highlands Insurance Company;royal Indemnity Company; Southeastern Fidelity Insurancecompany; Argonaut Insurance Company, Inc.; Meadreinsurance; Fuji Fire & Marine Insurance Company; Theamerican Insurance Company; the Fireman's Fund Insurancecompany; National Surety Corporation; the Federalinsurance Company; Allstate Insurance Company; Northbrookexcess & Surplus Insurance Company; Employer's Mutualcasualty Company; Employer's Surplus Lines Insurancecompany; Harbor Insurance; Casualty Insurance; the Homeinsurance Company; Transamerica Premier Insurance Company;international Surplus Lines Insurance Company; Stonewallinsurance Company, Defendants-appellees.illinois Central Railroad Company; Southern Pacifictransportation Company; Csx Transportation, Incorporated;burlington Northern Railroad Company; American Homeassurance Company; Audubon Indemnity Company; Birminghamfire Insurance Company of Pennsylvania; Granite Stateinsurance Company; Landmark Insurance Company; Lexingtoninsurance Company; National Union Fire Insurance Company Ofpittsburgh, Pennsylvania; New Hampshire Insurance Company;the Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania; Fennand London Market Companies, Amici Curiae
Date: December 7, 1994
Citation: 41 F.3d 928
22 Employee Benefits Cas. 1545,pens. Plan Guide (cch) P 23944w
Date: November 30, 1994
Citation: 153 F.3d 134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Date: November 22, 1994
Citation: 40 F.3d 1244
The Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Virginia;bell Atlantic Video Services Company; Bell Atlanticcorporation; Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company; C &p Telephone Company of Maryland; the Chesapeake and Potomactelephone Company of West Virginia; the Diamond Statetelephone Company; the Bell Telephone Company Ofpennsylvania; New Jersey Bell Telephone Company, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. United States of America; Federal Communicationscommission; Janet Reno, in Her Official Capacityas Attorney General of the Unitedstates, Defendants-appellants,andthe National Cable Television Association, Incorporated, Defendant.consumer Federation of America; Virginia Citizens Consumercouncil; Newspaper Association of America; Virginia Pressassociation; Computer & Communications Industryassociation; Mets Fans United/virginia Consumers for Cablechoice, et al.; Citizens for a Sound Economy Foundation;the American Legislative Exchange Council; the Competitiveenterprise Institute; the United States Telephoneassociation; Ameritech Corporation; Bellsouth Corporation;gte Service Corporation, on Behalf of Its Affiliateddomestic Operating Companies; Nynex Corporation; Pacifictelesis Group; Rochester Telephone Corporation;southwestern Bell Corporation; Us West Incorporated;telecommunications Industry Association, Fiber Opticsdivision, Amici Curiae.the Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Virginia;bell Atlantic Corporation; Bell Atlantic Video Servicescompany; Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company; Thechesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Maryland; Thechesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of West Virginia;the Diamond State Telephone Company; the Bell Telephonecompany of Pennsylvania; New Jersey Bell Telephone Company,plaintiffs-appellees, v. the National Cable Television Association, Incorporated,defendant-appellant,andunited States of America; Federal Communicationscommission; Janet Reno, in Her Official Capacityas Attorney General of the Unitedstates, Defendants.consumer Federation of America; Virginia Citizens Consumercouncil; Newspaper Association of America; Virginia Pressassociation; Computer & Communications Industryassociation; Mets Fans United/virginia Consumers for Cablechoice, et al.; Citizens for a Sound Economy Foundation;the American Legislative Exchange Council; the Competitiveenterprise Institute; the United States Telephoneassociation; Ameritech Corporation; Bellsouth Corporation;gte Service Corporation, on Behalf of Its Affiliateddomestic Operating Companies; Nynex Corporation; Pacifictelesis Group; Rochester Telephone Corporation;southwestern Bell Corporation; Us West Incorporated;telecommunications Industry Association, Fiber Opticsdivision, Amici Curiae
Date: November 21, 1994
Citation: 42 F.3d 181
In Re: David Bright, Petitioner
Date: November 15, 1994
Citation: 39 F.3d 1175
In Re: Louis Andrew Dizor, Jr., Petitioner
Date: November 15, 1994
Citation: 39 F.3d 1176
In Re: Ronald Graham, Petitioner
Date: November 15, 1994
Citation: 39 F.3d 1176
In Re: David Ray Matthews, Petitioner
Date: November 15, 1994
Citation: 39 F.3d 1177
In Re: Albert Russell Clay, Jr., Petitioner
Date: November 9, 1994
Citation: 40 F.3d 1243
In Re: Freddy Sylvestor Campbell, Petitioner
Date: November 3, 1994
Citation: 40 F.3d 1243
In Re: Dorothy P. Litzenberg, Petitioner
Date: November 3, 1994
Citation: 40 F.3d 1244
In Re: Restoney Robinson, Petitioner
Date: November 3, 1994
Citation: 40 F.3d 1244
In Re: James Earl Holston, Petitioner
Date: November 3, 1994
Citation: 40 F.3d 1244
In Re: Roosevelt Taylor, Jr., Petitioner
Date: November 3, 1994
Citation: 40 F.3d 1244
In Re: Billy Grisso, Petitioner
Date: November 3, 1994
Citation: 40 F.3d 1243
In Re: William T. Davis, Jr.; Jeanette C. Davis, Petitioners
Date: November 1, 1994
Citation: 39 F.3d 1176