1994 Fourth Circuit US Court of Appeals Case Law

Opinions 1 - 500 of 3006

Daniel J. Podberesky, Plaintiff-appellant, v. William E. Kirwan, President of the University of Marylandat College Park; University of Maryland at College Park(umcp); Monica Green; Maudlyn George, on Her Own Behalfand on Behalf of Her Daughter Allison George; Eileen Heath;richard A. Dalgetty; Gerard W. Henry; Maisha Herren;aletha S. Mcrae, on Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of Herdaughter Daletha Mcrae; Charles L. Smith, Iii, on His Ownbehalf and on Behalf of His Son Charles Smith, Iv,defendants-appellees,equal Opportunity Foundation; American Council Oneducation; Mexican-american Legal Defense and Educationfund; William Julius Wilson, Doctor; Association for Thestudy of Afro-american Life and History; Lawyers' Committeefor Civil Rights Under Law; United States of America, Amici Curiae.daniel J. Podberesky, Plaintiff-appellant, v. William E. Kirwan, President of the University of Marylandat College Park; University of Maryland at College Park(umcp); Monica Green; Maudlyn George, on Her Own Behalfand on Behalf of Her Daughter Allison George; Eileen Heath;richard A. Dalgetty; Gerard W. Henry; Maisha Herren;aletha S. Mcrae, on Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of Herdaughter Daletha Mcrae; Charles L. Smith, Iii, on His Ownbehalf and on Behalf of His Son Charles Smith, Iv,defendants-appellees,equal Opportunity Foundation; American Council Oneducation; Mexican-american Legal Defense and Educationfund; William Julius Wilson, Doctor; Association for Thestudy of Afro-american Life and History; Lawyers' Committeefor Civil Rights Under Law; United States of America, Amici Curiae
Date: December 30, 1994
Citation: 46 F.3d 5
In Re: Benjamin H. Jones, Petitioner
Date: December 22, 1994
Citation: 45 F.3d 426
In Re: Michael Rankins, Petitioner
Date: December 22, 1994
Citation: 45 F.3d 427
In Re: Rose Mary Wiggins Beverly, Petitioner
Date: December 22, 1994
Citation: 45 F.3d 425
Tyrone Thomas, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Marie Baxter, Defendant Appellee
Date: December 20, 1994
Citation: 43 F.3d 1468
In Re William D. Zack, Petitioner Appellant
Date: December 16, 1994
Citation: 43 F.3d 1470
Norfolk & Western Railway Company, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Accident & Casualty Insurance Company of Winterthur;insurance Company of Florida; Southern American Insurancecompany; Northwestern National Insurance Company Ofmilwaukee; Bellefonte Insurance Company; California Unioninsurance Company; the Insurance Company of North America;employers Insurance of Wausau; American Reinsurancecompany; Yosemite Insurance Company; General Reinsurancecorporation; United National Insurance Company; Protectivenational Insurance Company; Central National Insurancecompany of Omaha; American Centennial Insurance Company;first State Insurance Company; Highlands Insurance Company;royal Indemnity Company; Southeastern Fidelity Insurancecompany; Argonaut Insurance Company, Inc.; Meadreinsurance; Fuji Fire & Marine Insurance Company; Theamerican Insurance Company; the Fireman's Fund Insurancecompany; National Surety Corporation; the Federalinsurance Company; Allstate Insurance Company; Northbrookexcess & Surplus Insurance Company; Employer's Mutualcasualty Company; Employer's Surplus Lines Insurancecompany; Harbor Insurance; Casualty Insurance; the Homeinsurance Company; Transamerica Premier Insurance Company;international Surplus Lines Insurance Company; Stonewallinsurance Company, Defendants-appellees.illinois Central Railroad Company; Southern Pacifictransportation Company; Csx Transportation, Incorporated;burlington Northern Railroad Company; American Homeassurance Company; Audubon Indemnity Company; Birminghamfire Insurance Company of Pennsylvania; Granite Stateinsurance Company; Landmark Insurance Company; Lexingtoninsurance Company; National Union Fire Insurance Company Ofpittsburgh, Pennsylvania; New Hampshire Insurance Company;the Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania; Fennand London Market Companies, Amici Curiae
Date: December 7, 1994
Citation: 41 F.3d 928
22 Employee Benefits Cas. 1545,pens. Plan Guide (cch) P 23944w
Date: November 30, 1994
Citation: 153 F.3d 134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Date: November 22, 1994
Citation: 40 F.3d 1244
The Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Virginia;bell Atlantic Video Services Company; Bell Atlanticcorporation; Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company; C &p Telephone Company of Maryland; the Chesapeake and Potomactelephone Company of West Virginia; the Diamond Statetelephone Company; the Bell Telephone Company Ofpennsylvania; New Jersey Bell Telephone Company, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. United States of America; Federal Communicationscommission; Janet Reno, in Her Official Capacityas Attorney General of the Unitedstates, Defendants-appellants,andthe National Cable Television Association, Incorporated, Defendant.consumer Federation of America; Virginia Citizens Consumercouncil; Newspaper Association of America; Virginia Pressassociation; Computer & Communications Industryassociation; Mets Fans United/virginia Consumers for Cablechoice, et al.; Citizens for a Sound Economy Foundation;the American Legislative Exchange Council; the Competitiveenterprise Institute; the United States Telephoneassociation; Ameritech Corporation; Bellsouth Corporation;gte Service Corporation, on Behalf of Its Affiliateddomestic Operating Companies; Nynex Corporation; Pacifictelesis Group; Rochester Telephone Corporation;southwestern Bell Corporation; Us West Incorporated;telecommunications Industry Association, Fiber Opticsdivision, Amici Curiae.the Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Virginia;bell Atlantic Corporation; Bell Atlantic Video Servicescompany; Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company; Thechesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of Maryland; Thechesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of West Virginia;the Diamond State Telephone Company; the Bell Telephonecompany of Pennsylvania; New Jersey Bell Telephone Company,plaintiffs-appellees, v. the National Cable Television Association, Incorporated,defendant-appellant,andunited States of America; Federal Communicationscommission; Janet Reno, in Her Official Capacityas Attorney General of the Unitedstates, Defendants.consumer Federation of America; Virginia Citizens Consumercouncil; Newspaper Association of America; Virginia Pressassociation; Computer & Communications Industryassociation; Mets Fans United/virginia Consumers for Cablechoice, et al.; Citizens for a Sound Economy Foundation;the American Legislative Exchange Council; the Competitiveenterprise Institute; the United States Telephoneassociation; Ameritech Corporation; Bellsouth Corporation;gte Service Corporation, on Behalf of Its Affiliateddomestic Operating Companies; Nynex Corporation; Pacifictelesis Group; Rochester Telephone Corporation;southwestern Bell Corporation; Us West Incorporated;telecommunications Industry Association, Fiber Opticsdivision, Amici Curiae
Date: November 21, 1994
Citation: 42 F.3d 181
In Re: David Ray Matthews, Petitioner
Date: November 15, 1994
Citation: 39 F.3d 1177
In Re: David Bright, Petitioner
Date: November 15, 1994
Citation: 39 F.3d 1175
In Re: Louis Andrew Dizor, Jr., Petitioner
Date: November 15, 1994
Citation: 39 F.3d 1176
In Re: Ronald Graham, Petitioner
Date: November 15, 1994
Citation: 39 F.3d 1176
In Re: Albert Russell Clay, Jr., Petitioner
Date: November 9, 1994
Citation: 40 F.3d 1243
In Re: Freddy Sylvestor Campbell, Petitioner
Date: November 3, 1994
Citation: 40 F.3d 1243
In Re: Dorothy P. Litzenberg, Petitioner
Date: November 3, 1994
Citation: 40 F.3d 1244
In Re: Restoney Robinson, Petitioner
Date: November 3, 1994
Citation: 40 F.3d 1244
In Re: James Earl Holston, Petitioner
Date: November 3, 1994
Citation: 40 F.3d 1244
In Re: Roosevelt Taylor, Jr., Petitioner
Date: November 3, 1994
Citation: 40 F.3d 1244
In Re: Billy Grisso, Petitioner
Date: November 3, 1994
Citation: 40 F.3d 1243
In Re: William T. Davis, Jr.; Jeanette C. Davis, Petitioners
Date: November 1, 1994
Citation: 39 F.3d 1176

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.