United States of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Rudolph Lane, A/k/a Bay Boy, Defendant Appellant, 40 F.3d 1245 (4th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-92-88-N, CA-93-1159-2).
Rudolph Lane, appellant Pro Se. Charles Dee Griffith, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his post-judgment motion for reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Lane, No. CR-92-88-N; No. CA-93-1159-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 25, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
