Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant, v. Sergeant Dougherty; Custodian Hinnet; Custodian Dyke;lynn C. Phillips; Sergeant Lassiter; James Taylor,manager; Doctor Baloch; Doctor Sadat; Lieutenantwilkinson; Lieutenant Walker; Deputy Warden French;franklin E. Freeman, Jr.; Correctional Officer Barbour;correctional Officer Libon; Correctional Officer Williams;correctional Officer Smith, Defendants Appellees,and Gary Dixon, Defendant, 39 F.3d 1178 (4th Cir. 1994)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 39 F.3d 1178 (4th Cir. 1994) Submitted Oct. 18, 1994. Decided Nov. 15, 1994

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-93-764)

Cornelius Tucker, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal.*  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

 *

We also modify the district court's order to reflect that the dismissal was without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (1988)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.