Vermont Supreme Court Decisions
Dating from 1777, the Vermont Supreme Court holds the authority to make final decisions in appeals arising from any case in a Vermont court. The Supreme Court also supervises the legal profession in the state, including disciplinary matters for judges and attorneys. It issues rules of procedure for civil, criminal, and family cases, as well as the appellate process. Five justices serve on the Supreme Court, which was ranked as the seventh-most liberal state supreme court in the U.S. in a Stanford University study in 2012.
To serve on the Vermont Supreme Court, a prospective justice must have practiced law in Vermont for more than five of the last 10 years. Vermont imposes a mandatory retirement age of 70 on its justices, so no candidate can be 70 or older. Each justice serves a six-year term. Vermont uses the assisted appointment process to choose justices. This means that the Governor of Vermont reviews a list of candidates and chooses one of them to serve on the Court. Vermont differs from most states with regard to the process of retaining justices. Rather than holding a retention election or a general election, the state requires the legislature to vote on whether a justice should be retained at the end of their term.
A controversial decision by the Supreme Court involved the right to a speedy trial in a criminal case. It overturned a conviction of a defendant who was not tried for nearly three years after he was arrested. The delay resulted from the withdrawals and replacements of several public defenders, often at the defendant’s request. The Supreme Court ruled that the state had violated the defendant’s right to a speedy trial because it had not provided a public defender to represent him in a timely manner. The U.S. Supreme Court reversed this decision, ruling that public defenders work for their clients rather than the state. Delays or gaps in representation caused by the public defender or the defendant do not infringe on the right to a speedy trial.
- 2024 (132)
- 2023 (190)
- 2022 (175)
- 2021 (209)
- 2020 (218)
- 2019 (213)
- 2018 (263)
- 2017 (257)
- 2016 (161)
- 2015 (129)
- 2014 (136)
- 2013 (133)
- 2012 (110)
- 2011 (134)
- 2010 (112)
- 2009 (113)
- 2008 (131)
- 2007 (130)
- 2006 (125)
- 2005 (131)
- 2004 (120)
- 2003 (104)
- 2002 (133)
- 2001 (139)
- 2000 (149)
- 1999 (143)
- 1998 (134)
- 1997 (119)
- 1996 (132)
- 1995 (137)
- 1994 (141)
- 1993 (108)
- 1992 (138)
- 1991 (159)
- 1990 (176)
- 1989 (77)
- 1988 (158)
- 1987 (138)
- 1986 (100)
- 1985 (109)
- 1984 (121)
- 1983 (136)
- 1982 (157)
- 1981 (162)
- 1980 (118)
- 1979 (105)
- 1978 (115)
- 1977 (113)
- 1976 (110)
- 1975 (105)
- 1974 (112)
- 1973 (98)
- 1972 (82)
- 1971 (84)
- 1970 (73)
- 1969 (84)
- 1968 (67)
- 1967 (71)
- 1966 (58)
- 1965 (86)
- 1964 (49)
- 1963 (56)
- 1962 (55)
- 1961 (47)
- 1960 (53)
- 1959 (36)
- 1958 (43)
- 1957 (22)
- 1956 (38)
- 1955 (35)
- 1954 (38)
- 1953 (40)
- 1952 (43)
- 1951 (41)
- 1950 (37)
Recent Decisions From the Vermont Supreme Court
Date: August 30, 2024
Citation: 2024 VT 52
Docket Number: 23-AP-226
Justia Opinion Summary: In March 2022, a police officer arrested the defendant on suspicion of DUI. At the stationhouse, the officer read the defendant her implied-consent rights from a standard form, including the right to a second breath test…
Date: August 30, 2024
Citation: 2024 VT 56
Docket Number: 23-AP-319
Justia Opinion Summary: William and Mary Fulton purchased a 32-acre property in Jericho, Vermont, in August 2021. The property was enrolled in the Agricultural and Managed Forest Land Use Value Appraisal Program (Current Use program) under a…
Date: August 30, 2024
Citation: 2024 VT 57
Docket Number: 23-AP-400
Justia Opinion Summary: Daniel Pomerantz appealed the Cannabis Control Board’s denial of his request to waive application and licensing fees for his proposed commercial cannabis cultivation establishment. Pomerantz claimed he qualified as a…
Date: August 30, 2024
Citation: 2024 VT 59
Docket Number: 24-AP-015
Justia Opinion Summary: American Environmental, Inc. (plaintiff) challenged the Burlington School District (defendant) over a contract awarded for the demolition and remediation of Burlington High School, which was closed due to toxic…
Date: August 23, 2024
Citation: 2024 VT 55
Docket Number: 23-AP-389
Justia Opinion Summary: The petitioner worked part-time as a bus fueler and washer at Marble Valley Regional Transit (MVRT) for approximately four years. He passed a preemployment drug screen and signed an acknowledgment of MVRT’s drug and…
Date: August 15, 2024
Citation: 2020 VT 100
Docket Number: 23-AP-370
Date: August 15, 2024
Citation: 2012 VT 89
Docket Number: 23-AP-414
Date: August 15, 2024
Citation: 2005 VT 83
Docket Number: 23-AP-420
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.