JONES v. CORDELL

FIRST NAT. BANK OF OKEMAH v. BALDWIN
1912 OK 624
127 P. 260
34 Okla. 825
Case Number: 2206
Decided: 10/15/1912
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

FIRST NAT. BANK OF OKEMAH
v.
BALDWIN.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Failure to File Brief--Dismissal. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

C. B. Conners and W. A. Huser, for plaintiff in error.
Patterson & Brewer, for defendant in error.

ROBERTSON, C.

¶1 This appeal was filed in this court December 22, 1910. Neither party has filed a brief, nor has there been any excuse offered for their failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should, therefore, be dismissd for want of prosecution, under rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi). Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 P. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779, 117 P. 200; Bender v. Bender et al., 30 Okla. 288, 119 P. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 P. 205; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 P. 205.

¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.