COX v. ROGERS et al.

COX v. ROGERS et al.
1911 OK 461
119 P. 205
30 Okla. 296
Case Number: 1213
Decided: 11/18/1911
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

COX
v.
ROGERS et al.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Failure to File Briefs--Dismissal. Where the plaintiff in error files no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Error from District Court, Cherokee County; John H. Pitchford, Judge.

Action by J. D. Cox against Augustus L. Rogers and others. Judgment for plaintiff as to Augustus L. Rogers and in favor of the other defendants, and plaintiff brings error. Dismissed.

Kenneth S. Murchison, for plaintiff in error.
Ezzard & Holtzendorff, for defendant in error.

BREWER, C.

¶1 The petition in error and transcript of the record was filed in this court on November 12, 1909. The plaintiff in error has failed to file any brief in the case. The petition in error shall therefore be dismissed for want of prosetion. Hass et al. v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 P. 543; Maddin v. McCormick et al., 27 Okla. 778, 117 P. 200; McClelland v. Witherall, infra, 119 P. 205; Bender v. Bender et al., infra, 119 P. 205.

¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.

¶3 All the Justices concur.