BENDER v. BENDER et al.

BENDER v. BENDER et al.
1911 OK 457
119 P. 205
30 Okla. 288
Case Number: 1189
Decided: 11/18/1911
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

BENDER
v.
BENDER et al.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Dismissal--Failure to File Brief. Where plaintiff in error files no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Error from District Court, Alfalfa County; M. C. Garber, Judge.

Action by Luella Bender, administratrix of Frank Bender, against William Bender and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error. Dismissed.

Titus, Carpenter & Davis, for plaintiff in error.
E. W. Snoddy, for defendants in error

BREWER, C.

¶1 The petition in error and transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court November 4, 1909. The plaintiff in error has failed to file any brief in the cause, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi). The petition in error should therefore be dismissed, for want of prosecution. Hass et al. v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 P. 543; Maddin v. McCormick et al., 27 Okla. 778, 117 P. 200; McClelland v. Witherall, infra, 119 P. 205; Cox v. Rogers, infra, 119 P. 205.

¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.

¶3 All the Justices concur.