HILL v. RIDDLE

HILL v. RIDDLE
1912 OK 726
128 P. 112
36 Okla. 122
Case Number: 2141
Decided: 11/19/1912
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

HILL
v.
RIDDLE.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Failure to File Brief--Dismissal. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Crawford & Bolen, for plaintiff in error.

ROBERTSON, C.

¶1 This appeal was filed in this court November 22, 1910. No brief has been filed by either party, and it is evident that the appeal has been abandoned. The petition in error should, therefore, be dismissed for want of prosecution under rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi) of this court. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 P. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779, 117 P. 200; Bender v. Bender et al., 30 Okla. 288, 119 P. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 P. 205; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 P. 205.

¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.