TURNER v. HUFFSTETLER

Annotate this Case

TURNER v. HUFFSTETLER
1912 OK 579
126 P. 730
33 Okla. 462
Case Number: 2221
Decided: 09/11/1912
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

TURNER et al.
v.
HUFFSTETLER.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Dismissal--Failure to File Briefs. Where plaintiffs in error fail to serve and file their brief in accordance with rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi), or within the ex- tension of time thereafter granted by the court, the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Hughes & Miller, for plaintiffs in error.
Henry McGraw and Thompson & Smith, for defendant in error.

HAYES, J.

¶1 This case was filed in this court on December 29, 1911. Plaintiffs in error have failed to serve and file their brief in compliance with rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi), or within the extension of time thereafter granted by the court; and upon the authority of Douglas v. Clayton Townsite Co., 29 Okla. 9, 115 P. 1016, Bank of Taft v. Thompson, 29 Okla. 683, 119 P. 124, Bruce v. Ketcham, 29 Okla. 685, 119 P. 124, and Lugrand v. Harris, 29 Okla. 690, 119 P. 127, this appeal must be dismissed for want of prosecution.

¶2 TURNER, C. J., and WILLIAMS, KANE, and DUNN, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.