BRUCE v. KETCHAM

Annotate this Case

BRUCE v. KETCHAM
1911 OK 361
119 P. 124
29 Okla. 685
Case Number: 2155
Decided: 11/14/1911
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

BRUCE et al.
v.
KETCHAM.

Syllabus by the Court.

¶0 Same as that in Leavitt et al v. Commercial National Bank, 26 Okl. 164, 109 P. 71.

George K. Powell and Howell H. Parks, for plaintiffs in error. W. F. Rampendahl, for defendant in error.

WILLIAMS, J.

¶1 On December 1, 1910, petition in error, with case-made attached, was filed with the clerk of this court, and summons issued thereon. On September 11, 1911, the defendant in error filed a motion, which shows service upon the attorneys for plaintiffs in error, asking that the appeal be dismissed on account of failure to comply with rule 7 of this court (20 Okl. viii, 95 P. vi), requiring the plaintiff in error to prepare and serve briefs upon the defendant in error within 40 days after filing the petition in error. This appears not to have been done

¶2 The appeal is therefore dismissed. Leavitt et al. v. Commercial Nat. Bank, 26 Okl. 164, 109 P. 71. All the Justices concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.