BANK OF TAFT v. THOMPSON

Annotate this Case

BANK OF TAFT v. THOMPSON
1911 OK 355
119 P. 124
29 Okla. 683
Case Number: 1478
Decided: 11/14/1911
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

BANK OF TAFT
v.
THOMPSON et al.

Syllabus by the Court.

¶0 Dismissed for failure to file briefs within the time limited by rule 7 of the Supreme Court (95 Pac. vi).

Error from District Court, Muskogee County; John H. King, Judge.

Action between the Bank of Taft and William Thompson and Walter Dills. From the judgment, the Bank of Taft brings error. Dismissed.

Carl Pursel, for plaintiff in error. Benj. Martin, Jr., for defendants in error.

KANE, J.

¶1 This cause comes on to be heard upon motion of the defendants in error to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that the plaintiff in error has failed to observe rule 7 of this court (95 Pac. vi) in not filing briefs within the required time. An examination of the record shows that the plaintiff in error is in default in regard to filing briefs, although the time for doing so has expired.

¶2 The motion to dismiss must be sustained. All the Justices concur, except WILLIAMS, J., absent.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.