Shane Jay Williams v. The State of Wyoming
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2022 WY 141 October Term, A.D. 2022 November 9, 2022 SHANE JAY WILLIAMS, Appellant (Defendant), S-22-0185, S-22-0186, S-22-0187, S-22-0188 v. THE STATE OF WYOMING, Appellee (Plaintiff). ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE [¶1] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following receipt of Appellant’s Appeal brief letter, which was filed October 24, 2022, in docket S-22-0185. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the district court resolved the cases that give rise to the captioned appeals. In S-22-0185 and S-22-0186, Appellant seeks review of orders revoking his probation, which stemmed from convictions for check fraud. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-3702. In both cases, Appellant admitted he violated his probation, based on being charged with additional offenses. Following the probation revocations, the district court imposed the underlying three to five-year sentences. In S-22-0187 and S-22-0188, Appellant seeks review of two convictions for burglary. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-3-301. Appellant entered unconditional guilty pleas to those charges. The district court imposed a five to seven-year sentence on each count. The district court ordered all four sentences be served concurrently. [¶2] On September 8, 2022, Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel e-filed Motions to Withdraw as Counsel, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). This Court subsequently entered orders granting extensions of time to file pro se briefs. This Court ordered that, on or before October 24, 2022, Appellant was permitted to file with this Court pro se briefs specifying the issues he would like the Court to consider in these appeals. This Court also provided notice that, after the time for filing pro se briefs expired, this Court would make its ruling on counsel’s motions to withdraw and, if appropriate, make a final decision on these appeals. In dockets S-22-0186, S-22-0187, and S-22-0188, Appellant did not file a pro se brief or other pleading in the time allotted. In docket S-22-0185, Appellant filed an Appeal brief letter. [¶3] Now, following a careful review of that letter, the records, and the Anders briefs submitted by appellate counsel, this Court finds appellate counsel’s motions to withdraw should be granted and the probation revocations and the judgments should be affirmed. It is, therefore, [¶4] ORDERED that the captioned appeals are consolidated; and it is further [¶5] ORDERED that the Wyoming Public Defender’s Office, court-appointed counsel for Appellant Shane Jay Williams, is hereby permitted to withdraw as counsel of record for Appellant; and it is further [¶6] ORDERED that, in docket S-22-0185, the Laramie County District Court’s October 19, 2021, Order Revoking Probation and Imposing Sentence be, and the same hereby is, affirmed; and it is further [¶7] ORDERED that, in docket S-22-0186, the Laramie County District Court’s October 19, 2021, Order Revoking Probation and Imposing Sentence be, and the same hereby is, affirmed; and it is further [¶8] ORDERED that, in docket S-22-0187, the Laramie County District Court’s October 19, 2021, Judgment and Sentence be, and the same hereby is, affirmed; and it is further [¶9] ORDERED that, in docket S-22-0188, the Laramie County District Court’s October 19, 2021, Judgment and Sentence be, and the same hereby is, affirmed. [¶10] DATED this 9th day of November, 2022. BY THE COURT: /s/ KATE M. FOX Chief Justice
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
