Cotney v. State
Annotate this Case
The Supreme Court affirmed Defendant's conviction of aggravated assault and battery and misdemeanor interference with a peace officer, holding that there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction and that Defendant was not denied his right to a speedy trial.
On appeal, Defendant argued that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to show that he threatened to use a drawn deadly weapon on another person and that he was denied his right to a speedy trial under Wyo. R. Crim. P. 48 and the United States and Wyoming Constitutions. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding (1) the evidence was sufficient to show Defendant threatened to use a drawn deadline weapon on another person; and (2) Defendant was not denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.