Jermain Lashawn Wright v. The State of Wyoming
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2021 WY 129 October Term, A.D. 2021 November 24, 2021 JERMAIN LASHAWN WRIGHT, Appellant (Defendant), v. S-21-0162 THE STATE OF WYOMING, Appellee (Plaintiff). ORDER AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT’S JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE [¶1] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification that Appellant has not filed a pro se brief within the time allotted by this Court. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Appellant entered an unconditional “no contest” plea to strangulation of a household member. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-509(a)(i). The district court imposed a three to four-year sentence, which was suspended in favor of three years of probation. Appellant filed this appeal to challenge the district court’s May 5, 2021 Judgment and Sentence. [¶2] On September 24, 2021, Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel filed a Motion to Withdraw as Counsel, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). This Court subsequently ordered that Appellant may “file with this Court a pro se brief which specifies the issues for the Court to consider in this appeal.” This Court also provided notice that, after the time for filing a pro se brief expired, this Court would “make its ruling on counsel’s motion to withdraw, and if appropriate, make a final decision” on this appeal. This Court notes Appellant did not file a pro se brief or other pleading in the time allotted. [¶3] Now, following a careful review of the record and the Anders brief submitted by appellate counsel, this Court finds appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw should be granted and the district court’s Judgment and Sentence should be affirmed. It is, therefore, [¶4] ORDERED that the Wyoming Public Defender’s Office, court-appointed counsel for Appellant Jermain Lashawn Wright, is hereby permitted to withdraw as counsel of record for Appellant; and it is further [¶5] ORDERED that the Laramie County District Court’s May 5, 2021 Judgment and Sentence be, and the same hereby is, affirmed. [¶6] DATED this 24th day of November, 2021. BY THE COURT: /s/ KATE M. FOX Chief Justice
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
