Bezold v. State
Annotate this Case
The Supreme Court affirmed Defendant's conviction of eight counts of forgery, holding that the district court did not err or abuse its discretion.
On appeal, Defendant argued that the evidence was insufficient to show an intent to defraud and that the district court erred in instructing the jury on the required intent to defraud. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the district court (1) did not err in denying Defendant's motion for judgment of acquittal; and (2) did not abuse its discretion when it instructed the jury on the required element of intent to defraud.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.