Sargent v. State

Annotate this Case

Sargent v. State
1992 WY 32
828 P.2d 100
Case Number: 92-45
Decided: 04/01/1992
Supreme Court of Wyoming

Daniel Devone SARGENT,

Appellant (Defendant),

v.

The STATE of Wyoming,

Appellee (Plaintiff).

Appeal from the District Court of Weston County; Terrence L. O'Brien, Judge.

Daniel Devone Sargent, pro se.

Joseph B. Meyer, Atty. Gen., Sylvia L. Hackl, Deputy Atty. Gen., and Barbara Boyer, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before URBIGKIT, C.J., and THOMAS, CARDINE, MACY and GOLDEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

[¶1]      Appellant, Daniel Devone Sargent, appeals from the second denial by the trial court of a motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to W.R.Cr.P. 36. The subject of exercised discretion to reduce a sentence under that rule is identically presented as discussed in our recent decision of Peper v. State, 776 P.2d 761 (Wyo. 1989). Following a review of the record, we find no basis to determine that the trial court abused its discretion in the post-sentencing denial of the motion for reduction.

[¶2]      The order denying motion for sentence reduction, therefore, is affirmed.

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.