Cummins v. Albany County Credit & Collection Bureau, Inc
Annotate this Case
Cummins v. Albany County Credit & Collection Bureau, Inc
1991 WY 164
821 P.2d 1296
Case Number: 91-75
Decided: 12/13/1991
Supreme Court of Wyoming
SARAH ALTON CUMMINS, APPELLANT (DEFENDANT),
v.
ALBANY
COUNTY CREDIT & COLLECTION BUREAU, INC., A WYOMING CORPORATION, APPELLEE
(PLAINTIFF).
Appeal from the District Court, AlbanyCounty, Arthur T. Hanscum,
J.
Sarah
Alton Cummins, pro
se.
Paul
D. Schierer, Pence and MacMillan, Laramie, for appellee.
Before URBIGKIT, C.J., THOMAS and MACY,
JJ., and ROONEY and BROWN, JJ. (Retired).
ROONEY,
Justice, Retired.
[¶1.] Appellant appeals from
a judgment entered February 25, 1991, against appellant "jointly and severally
with the Judgment previously entered against" appellant's husband.1 She words the issue on appeal: "Can
a spouse be held responsible for the payment of a debt incurred solely by the
other spouse?" She argues that, under the circumstances of this case, she is not
responsible for the debt.
[¶2.] We
affirm.
[¶3.] As noted by appellee,
neither this court nor the district court need consider this issue inasmuch as
the appellant, through counsel, stipulated to the entry of the judgment against
her. The November 26, 1990 judgment against appellant's husband recited in
part:
"Plaintiff
and Defendant Sarah A. Cummins have stipulated to an agreement which the Court
approves, wherein Judgment will be entered against Defendant George Coury
Cummins and execution may be had thereon. On or about January 15, 1991,
Plaintiff has the right to proceed against Sarah A. Cummins for any deficiency
balance remaining due on the accounts in Plaintiff's Complaint, by motion and
affidavit. Any Judgment entered against Sarah A. Cummins as a result of this
conditional ruling shall be joint and several with George Coury
Cummins."
[¶4.] The judgment from which
this appeal is taken recites that the matter came before the court upon a motion
"pursuant to a Stipulation of the parties previously" made.2
[¶5.] Stipulations are
favored by courts. Beard v. Beard,
368 P.2d 953, 955 (Wyo. 1962); 83 C.J.S. Stipulations § 2 (1953). See Bard Ranch, Inc. v. Weber, 538 P.2d 24, 31 (Wyo.
1975) (citations omitted) stating that "[t]he parties are bound by the
stipulation of facts just as they are bound by admissions in
pleadings."
"The
parties may stipulate to extend the time for rendition of judgment, as to the
character of the judgment or order to be entered, and various other matters in
connection with judgment or execution, but they cannot stipulate as to the
meaning or effect of the judgment."
83
C.J.S. Stipulations §
10(f)(12).
[¶6.] Appellant does not
dispute the fact that the stipulation was made in open court or that it was
other than as recited in the November 26, 1990 judgment.
[¶7.] Both the district court
and this court are bound by, and must enforce, the stipulation made in this
case.
[¶8.]
Affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
1 Appellee instituted this action
against both appellant and her husband for payment of medical bills incurred for
medical treatment and services rendered to the husband subsequent to a time at
which appellant and her husband were separated in 1982, but not divorced. The
account was turned over to appellee for collection. On November 26, 1990, a
summary judgment was entered against appellant's husband.
2 About a month after the January 15,
1991 date contained in the judgment against appellant's husband, appellee filed
and served a motion for entry of judgment against appellant. It was supported by
affidavit reciting non-payment by husband. The motion was not contested and the
judgment against appellant was entered.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.