In re Stuart Robinson, Esq. (Office of Disciplinary Counsel)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Vermont Supreme Court Filed: October 15, 2021 VERMONT SUPREME COURT Case No. £9 21—AP-240 109 State Street Montpelier VT 05609-0801 802—828—4774 wwwvermontjudiciaryorg ENTRY ORDER OCTOBER TERM, In re Stuart Robinson, Esq. (Of ce of Disciplinary Counsel*) 2021 } ORIGINAL JURISDICTION } } Prof’l Resp. Bd. } PRB File Nos. 2020-007, 2021-099 In the above—entitled cause, the Clerk Will enter: Respondent Stuart Jay Robinson, a lawyer licensed to practice in Vermont, is the subject of several disciplinary proceedings. He has alleged in the course of those proceedings that he is unable to assist in his defense due to a physical disability. Pursuant to A.O. 9, Rule 25(B), respondent is immediately transferred to disability inactive status pending determination of the incapacity by a PRB hearing panel. The hearing panel assigned by the Board to determine the incapacity may order respondent to be examined by a quali ed medical expert either sua sponte or on motion by Special Disciplinary Counsel. BY THE COURT: Pmllaa Paul L. Reiber,Chief Justice eth Robinson, Associate Justice gassociate Justice Harold E. Eaton, Jr. e R. oll, Associate Justice illiam D. Cohen, Associate Justice
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
