State v. Sheperd
Annotate this CaseState v. Sheperd (2010-336)
2011 VT 44
[Filed 11-Apr-2011]
ENTRY ORDER
2011 VT 44
SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO. 2010-336
APRIL TERM, 2011
State of Vermont
}
APPEALED FROM:
}
}
Superior Court, Grande Isle Unit,
}
Criminal Division
}
Donald Sheperd
}
DOCKET NOS. 48-6-09 Gicr &
27-2-10 Gicr
In the above-entitled cause, the Clerk will enter:
¶ 1. Defendant seeks full-Court review of a previous single-justice decision requiring a waiver "on the record in open court," pursuant to V.R.A.P. 3(b)(2), before this Court will accept the parties' stipulation to dismissal of this automatic appeal from a sentence of life imprisonment. We conclude that Rule 3(b)(2) applies regardless of whether a defendant sentenced to life imprisonment seeks to waive the right to an automatic appeal before or after the appeal is docketed in this Court. Accordingly, we will not accept the parties' stipulation to dismissal of this appeal unless defendant waives the right to appeal on the record in open court. That requirement may be satisfied through a video or telephonic conference.
¶ 2. JOHNSON, J., concurring. I concur that the "in open court" waiver requirement contained in V.R.A.P. 3(b)(2) should not be applied depending on whether an appeal from a life-imprisonment case has been docketed at this Court, but I fail to see the benefit of applying that requirement in cases such as this, where the defendant has pled guilty to the underlying conviction. In cases where the defendant has entered into a plea agreement that forecloses challenges to the underlying conviction, I see little purpose in mandating a potentially time-consuming and costly requirement of a formal waiver following a court colloquy. I recommend that the Criminal Rules Committee take up the issue.
BY THE COURT:
Paul L. Reiber, Chief Justice
John A. Dooley, Associate Justice
Denise R. Johnson, Associate Justice
Marilyn S. Skoglund, Associate Justice
Brian L. Burgess, Associate Justice
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.