In re Bailey

Annotate this Case
                                ENTRY ORDER

                      SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO. 90Ä543

                            DECEMBER TERM, 1991


In re Thomas B. Bailey, Esq.      }          Original Jurisdiction
                                  }
                                  }
                                  }          FROM:
                                  }          Professional Conduct Board
                                  }
                                  }
                                  }          DOCKET NOS. 89.56, 89.56.1
                                                         and 89.56.2

             In the above entitled cause the Clerk will enter:

     The December 6, 1991, decision of the Professional Conduct Board, which
accepted the stipulation between bar counsel and respondent of the same
date, is hereby approved.

     Pursuant thereto:

     (1) respondent has complied with the terms of this Court's October 11,
1991, suspension order;

     (2) respondent is suspended for an additional period, which began on
November 11, 1991, and shall expire on February 10, 1992; and

     (3) respondent is on probation for a period of two years, during which
respondent's trust account will be maintained by a bookkeeper or accountant
and during which respondent will be required to demonstrate, by prompt sub-
mission of quarterly reports prepared by an independent accountant, that
his records conform to the requirements of DR 9Ä102(C).

                                   BY THE COURT:



                                   Frederic W. Allen, Chief Justice


                                   Ernest W. Gibson III, Associate Justice


[x]  Publish                       John A. Dooley, Associate Justice

[ ]  Do Not Publish
                                   James L. Morse, Associate Justice


                                   Denise R. Johnson, Associate Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.