Maskell v. Beaulieu

Annotate this Case

435 A.2d 699 (1981)

Ronald S. MASKELL, Ephriam J. Machia and Rosalie A. Machia v. Hyacinthe BEAULIEU.

No. 372-80.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

September 1, 1981.

David M. Yarnell and Daniel J. Lynch of John Kissane Associates, St. Albans, for plaintiffs.

*700 James L. Levy and Michael Rose, Law Offices of James L. Levy, St. Albans, for defendant.

Before BARNEY, C. J., and LARROW, BILLINGS, HILL and UNDERWOOD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs brought an action for specific performance and damages. Defendant answered and counterclaimed for damages. The action was heard by a court consisting of a presiding judge and two assistant judges.

The court ordered defendant to convey the real property at issue to the Machias and pay damages to the Machias and Maskell. It was further ordered that Maskell pay defendant one dollar on his counterclaim. From this order, defendant appeals. We reverse.

In Pockette v. LaDuke, 139 Vt. ___, 432 A.2d 1191 (1981), we held that a suit in equity should be heard alone and exclusively by the presiding superior judge. Assistant judges have no role in these matters, and their presence is improper. The record in this case reveals that the assistant judges not only sat at the hearing but participated in making the findings of fact and conclusions of law.

As this case sounds in equity and as the assistant judges participated in the hearing, we hold that this court was improperly constituted. Since this circumstance clearly affected the eventual result, we remand for retrial on all matters still at issue.

Reversed and remanded.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.