HILL v. CITY OF KINGFISHER

HILL v. CITY OF KINGFISHER
1913 OK 656
136 P. 775
39 Okla. 782
Case Number: 3176
Decided: 11/18/1913
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

HILL
v.
CITY OF KINGFISHER.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Brief--Dismissal. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 95 P. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Cunningham & Weiss, for plaintiff in error.
John T. Bradley, Jr., for defendant in error.

 
ROBERTSON, C.

¶1 This appeal was filed in this court October 14, 1911. Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 95 P. vi). Streeter v. McCoy, 34 Okla. 490, 126 P. 216; Thompson v. Murray, 34 Okla. 521, 125 P. 1133; Streeter v. Huene, 34 Okla. 491, 126 P. 216; Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 34 Okla. 759, 127 P. 260; M., O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 34 Okla. 816, 127 P. 386; First Nat. Bank v. Baldwin, 34 Okla. 825, 127 P. 260; Snow v. Frye, 34 Okla. 826, 127 P. 422.

¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.