RELIABLE INS. CO. v. NEWCOMBER

RELIABLE INS. CO. v. NEWCOMBER
1912 OK 648
127 P. 260
34 Okla. 759
Case Number: 2140
Decided: 10/15/1912
Supreme Court of Oklahoma

RELIABLE INS. CO.
v.
NEWCOMBER.

Syllabus

¶0 APPEAL AND ERROR--Dismissal--Filing of Brief. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

O. L. Price and Morse & Standeven, for plaintiff in error.
Hays, Carpenter & Hughes, for defendant in error.

ROBERTSON, C.

¶1 This appeal was filed in this court November 21, 1910. Neither party has filed a brief, nor is there any excuse offered for their failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution, under rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 95 P. vi). Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 P. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779, 117 P. 200; Bender v. Bender et al., 30 Okla. 288, 119 P. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 P. 205; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 P. 205.

¶2 By the Court: It is so ordered.