1992 Tenth Circuit US Court of Appeals Case Law

Opinions 1001 - 1410 of 1410

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, As Manager of Thefslic Resolution Fund, As Receiver for First Texas Savingsassociation, a Savings Association Organized Pursuant to Thelaws of the State of Texas, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Okc Partners, Ltd., a Texas Limited Partnership; James M.an, an Individual, Limited Partner; Eric David Bernsen, Anindividual, Limited Partner; Gary L. Chappell, Anindividual, Limited Partner; Lipscomb Norvell, Jr., Anindividual, Limited Partner; Ronald D. Pephens, Anindividual, Limited Partner; Andrew B. Phillips, Anindividual, Limited Partner; Russell S. Sampson, Anindividual, Limited Partner; 3300 Investments, Anunincorporated Business Association, Limited Partner; Allenb. Craig, Iii, an Individual and Principal of 3300investments; C.r. Gregg, an Individual and Principal Of3300 Investments, Defendants,andeagle/texas Realty Company, Inc., a Texas Corporation,general Partner; Michael B. Birnie, an Individual, Limitedpartner; Douglas A. Dawson, an Individual, Limited Partner;dale B. Elmore, an Individual, Limited Partner; C. Jacksongrayson, Jr., an Individual, Limited Partner; Hanaho, Ltd.,a Texas Limited Partnership, Limited Partner; John J.redfern, Iii, an Individual, General Partner of Hanaho,ltd.; John H. Lindsey, an Individual, Limited Partner; Jayw. Lorch, an Individual, Limited Partner; Peter L. Marr, Anindividual, Limited Partner; W.e. Penland, Jr., Anindividual, Limited Partner; John J. Plotnik, Anindividual, Limited Partner; Fred A. Sheriff, Anindividual, Limited Partner; L.b. Windham, an Individual,limited Partner, Defendants-appellants,first Gibralter Bank, Fsb, a Federal Savings Bank, Intervenor
Date: April 10, 1992
Citation: 961 F.2d 219
Arthur M. Primas, Plaintiff-appellee,andbrenda M. Primas, Plaintiff, v. the City of Oklahoma City, a Municipal Corporation; Fredanderson, Individually and As Assistant Municipal Counselorand Employee of the City of Oklahoma City, Through Themunicipal Counselor's Office; Terry Childers, Individuallyand As City Manager and Employee of the City of Oklahomacity; Don Pennington, a Police Officer and Employee of Thecity of Oklahoma City, Through the Oklahoma City Policedepartment, Defendants,andfred Hays, Individually and As Assistant City Manager Andemployee of the City of Oklahoma City, Through Thecity Manager's Office, Defendant-appellant.arthur M. Primas, Plaintiff-appellee,andbrenda M. Primas, Plaintiff, v. the City of Oklahoma City, a Municipal Corporation; Fredanderson, Individually and As Assistant Municipal Counselorand Employee of the City of Oklahoma City, Through Themunicipal Counselor's Office; Terry Childers, Individuallyand As City Manager and Employee of the City of Oklahomacity; Fred Hays, Individually and As Assistant City Managerand Employee of the City of Oklahoma City, Through the Citymanager's Office, Defendants,anddon Pennington, a Police Officer and Employee of the City Ofoklahoma City, Through the Oklahoma City Policedepartment, Defendant-appellant.arthur M. Primas, Plaintiff-appellant,andbrenda M. Primas, Plaintiff, v. the City of Oklahoma City, a Municipal Corporation; Terrychilders, Individually and As City Manager and Employee Ofthe City of Oklahoma City; Fred Hays, Individually and Asassistant City Manager and Employee of the City of Oklahomacity, Through the City Manager's Office; Don Pennington, Apolice Officer and Employee of the City of Oklahoma City,through the Oklahoma City Police Department, Defendants-appellees,andfred Anderson, Individually and As Assistant Municipalcounselor and Employee of the City of Oklahomacity, Through the Municipal Counselor'soffice, Defendant.arthur M. Primas; Brenda M. Primas, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. the City of Oklahoma City, a Municipal Corporation; Terrychilders, Individually and As City Manager and Employee Ofthe City of Oklahoma City; Fred Hays, Individually and Asassistant City Manager and Employee of the City of Oklahomacity, Through the City Manager's Office; Don Pennington, Apolice Officer and Employee of the City of Oklahoma City,through the Oklahoma City Police Department, Defendants,andfred Anderson, Individually and As Assistant Municipalcounselor and Employee of the City of Oklahomacity, Through the Municipal Counselor'soffice, Defendant-appellee
Date: March 16, 1992
Citation: 958 F.2d 1506
No. 91-1196
Date: February 11, 1992
Citation: 955 F.2d 49

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.