Arkansas Judicial Discipline & Disability Commission v. Bourne (Per Curiam, with Concurring)
Annotate this Case
Justia Opinion Summary
Want to stay in the know about new opinions from the Arkansas Supreme Court?
Sign up for free summaries delivered directly to your inbox. Learn More ›
You already receive new opinion summaries from Arkansas Supreme Court. Did you know we offer summary newsletters for even more practice areas and jurisdictions? Explore them here.
The Supreme Court granted a petition sought by the Arkansas Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission for expedited consideration and report of uncontested sanction following its investigation of complaints against Pope County District Court Judge Don Bourne, holding that Judge Bourne's conduct warranted sanctions.
Several complaints involving two counts were filed against Judge Bourne involving his conduct toward unrepresented litigants. Judge Bourne did not contest either count, waived a formal disciplinary hearing, and accepted the investigatory panel's recommended sanction of suspension without pay for ninety days, with seventy-five days held in abeyance for one year. The commission accepted the recommended sanction. The Supreme Court suspended Judge Bourne from the bench without pay for ninety days with seventy-five days held in abeyance if he agrees to, among other things, never again to hold judicial office after his current term expires, ordering that the mandate shall issue immediately.
Download PDF
Cite as 2022 Ark. 151 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. D-22-478 Opinion Delivered: August 9, 2022 ARKANSAS JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE AND PETITIONER’S REPORT OF DISABILITY COMMISSION PETITIONER UNCONTESTED SANCTION V. EXPEDITED PETITION GRANTED; DON BOURNE, POPE COUNTY ORDER OF SUSPENSION DISTRICT COURT JUDGE RESPONDENT WITHOUT PAY IMPOSED. PER CURIAM The Arkansas Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission filed a petition for expedited consideration and report of uncontested sanction following its investigation of complaints lodged against the Honorable Don Bourne, a Pope County District Court Judge. The Commission and Judge Bourne have agreed to recommend to this court a suspension without pay for ninety days, with seventy-five days held in abeyance for one year. Judge Bourne has also agreed to multiple remedial measures and that he will never again hold judicial office once his current term expires. We grant the petition, suspend Judge Bourne without pay, and order the additional conditions. Judge Bourne has served as a district judge since 2001. Recently, several complaints have been filed against Judge Bourne involving his conduct toward unrepresented litigants. This conduct includes demeaning comments toward Spanish-speaking defendants and negative comments to defendants who are not from Pope County (Count 1). Other complaints concerned Judge Bourne’s failure to conduct proper indigency determinations and failure to keep adequate records (Count 2). Judge Bourne did not contest either count and instead waived a formal disciplinary hearing and accepted the Investigatory Panel’s recommended sanction. The Commission voted 8–0 to approve the Panel’s recommended disposition on both counts. Because the sanction for Count 1 includes a suspension without pay, the Commission submitted its recommendation to this court for review on an expedited basis. 1 Ark. Jud. Discipline & Disability Comm’n R. 12(B) (providing for expedited consideration of Commission matters). This court grants expedited consideration and now decides whether to accept the Commission’s uncontested report and recommended sanction of suspension without pay. Ark. Jud. Discipline & Disability Comm’n R. 9(J) & 12(D). We can accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations of the Commission. Id. R. 12(G). We review judicial-discipline matters de novo. Ark. Jud. Discipline & Disability Comm’n v. Sims, 2021 Ark. 126, at 2. Having reviewed the documents provided, along with mitigating factors, we accept the Commission’s findings of fact and recommendation of suspension. We suspend Judge Don Bourne from the bench without pay for ninety days, with seventy-five of those days held in abeyance if he completes or adheres to the agreed remedial measures, including, but not limited to: 1 Judge Bourne accepted a censure for Count 2, which is not before this court on review. The sanctions cover the following Commission case numbers: 21-125; 21-182; 21184; 21-253; 21-257; 21-320; 21-323; 21-326; and 21-332. 2 • Spend the two-week suspension attending and observing other district court judges and write reflective reports on each visit; • Obtain and maintain a digital-audio recorder in his courtrooms prior to the end of his suspension and preserve audio recordings of court proceedings; • Allow the Commission to monitor his courtroom and allow access to staff and documents as needed; • Attend an approved online judicial-ethics class; and • Read a report and complete online training about bullying and harassment in the legal profession. Additionally, Judge Don Bourne shall never again hold a judicial office after his current term expires. This court notes that in addition to the public signal that a suspension without pay sends, the suspension also imposes a financial penalty of several thousands of dollars in lost pay. The suspension will begin on August 16, 2022. The mandate shall issue immediately. Expedited petition granted; order of suspension without pay imposed; mandate to issue immediately. WOMACK, J., concurs. SHAWN A. WOMACK, Justice, concurring. While I agree this matter should receive expedited consideration, and also agree to accept the sanctions outlined by this court, I write separately to again note that the passage of Amendment 80 rendered the Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission constitutionally invalid in its present form. See In re Ark. Jud. Discipline & Disability Comm’n Appointments, 2021 Ark. 27 (per curiam) (Womack, J., concurring). Accordingly, the discipline administered today can and should be 3 administered as part of the judicial power granted exclusively to this and other courts of this state by Amendment 80, and through a process designed and approved by us, rather than as a mere ratification of the actions of a defunct Commission. I respectfully concur. 4
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
