Redus v. State (Majority, with Dissenting)
Annotate this Case
The Supreme Court treated Petitioner’s pro se motion for rule on clerk seeking to proceed with an appeal as a motion for belated appeal and denied the motion, holding that Petitioner’s petition was wholly without merit, and Petitioner could not prevail on appeal.
Petitioner filed a pro se petition to correct an illegal sentence under Ark. Code Ann. 16-90-111, which the trial court denied. Petitioner then filed this motion. The Supreme Court denied the motion, holding that Petitioner’s sentence was clearly within the prescribed statutory range and was not illegal, and therefore, the trial court’s denial of his most recent claim for relief under section 16-90-111 was not in error.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.