Scott v. State
Annotate this Case
The Supreme Court denied Petitioner’s motion asking to be provided with a copy of four coram nobis petitions he previously filed that were denied by the trial court without requiring him to remit the standard photocopying fee charged by the clerk’s office, holding that Petitioner failed to show that copies of the coram nobis petitions should be provided to him at no cost.
In his motion, Petitioner appended an affidavit of indigency. The Supreme Court noted that, to be entitled to copies at public expense, a petition must demonstrate a compelling need for the copies to support some allegation contained in a petition for postconviction relief. Because Petitioner cited no postconviction remedy available to him and otherwise made no showing of compelling need, the Supreme Court denied the motion.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.