Lewis v. State (Majority, with Concurring)
Annotate this Case
The Supreme Court denied Petitioner’s pro se petition to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court to consider a petition for writ of error coram nobis, which rendered moot Petitioner’s pro se motion to rely to the State’s response to his coram nobis petition.
In seeking coram nobis relief, Petitioner alleged that the prosecutor withheld material evidence and knowingly used perjured testimony, in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). In denying relief, the Supreme Court held that Petitioner failed to allege sufficient grounds warranting coram-nobis relief and otherwise failed to demonstrate due diligence in bringing this petition.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.