Henington v. State (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CaseAfter a jury trial, Petitioner was found guilty of the rape of a child. Petitioner was sentenced to 432 months’ imprisonment. The court of appeals affirmed. Petitioner later filed a pro se petition to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court to consider a petition for writ of error coram nobis in the case, claiming that there was prosecutorial misconduct in his trial, that the trial court made some mistake in its rulings, and that the evidence at his trial was not sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict. The Supreme Court denied the petition, holding that Petitioner failed to assert a ground for the writ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.