Dunahue v. Dennis (Per Curiam)Annotate this Case
In 2008, Appellant was convicted of aggravated robbery. In 2016, Appellant tendered a pro se pleading asking the Supreme Court to intervene and to direct the circuit court judge and circuit clerk to permit him to file his pro se petitions for writs of habeas corpus and petitions for writs of mandamus and for them to act on his petitions. The Supreme Court treated Appellant’s motion for intervention as a writ of mandamus and ordered the circuit judge to set a hearing on his writ of habeas corpus in Case No. 40CV-16-44.