Chatmon v. State (Per Curiam)Annotate this Case
After a jury trial, Appellant was found guilty of three counts of aggravated robbery and one count of theft of property. The Supreme Court affirmed Appellant’s convictions and sentences on appeal. Thereafter, Appellant filed a petition for postconviction relief, arguing, among other claims, that his arrest was based on insufficient evidence, the trial court committed error during trial, his right to a speedy trial was violated, counsel provided ineffective assistance, and the prosecutor engaged in impermissible misconduct. The trial court rejected Appellant’s claims. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that Appellant’s claims were either not properly before the Court, without merit, or not grounds for postconviction relief.