Robinson v. State (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CaseIn two separate cases, Appellant pleaded guilty to several offenses, including aggravated robbery and theft. Appellant filed a timely petition pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 37 alleging that his convictions were the result of ineffective assistance of his counsel, Kathryn Hudson. The circuit court denied the petition. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the circuit court did not commit clear error in denying Appellant’s petition, as Appellant failed to offer sufficient proof that a State plea offer existed that counsel failed to communicate and failed to explain how certain conduct on the part of counsel intimidated him into pleading guilty.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.