Moten v. State (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CasePetitioner was convicted of first-degree battery and second-degree battery and sentenced to an aggregate sentence of 264 months’ imprisonment. The convictions were affirmed on appeal. Now before the Supreme Court was Petitioner’s second pro se application to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court to consider a petition for writ of error coram nobis and Petitioner’s motion for permission to file a response to the State’s response. The Supreme Court dismissed the petition and declared the motion moot, holding that Petitioner did not establish a basis for issuance of the writ in his first coram-nobis petition, and his reassertion of essentially the same claims in the instant petition was a misuse of the remedy.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.