Davis v. State (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CaseAfter a jury trial, Petitioner was found guilty of capital murder, attempted first-degree murder, and two counts of use of a firearm in the commission of a felony. The Supreme Court affirmed. Now before the Court was Petitioner’s pro se petition to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court to consider a petition for writ of error coram nobis. In his petition, Petitioner made claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, insufficiency of the evidence, trial error, and mental incompetence. The Supreme Court denied the petition, holding that Petitioner’s claim of mental incompetence was unavailing and that the remainder of Petitioner’s allegations were outside the scope of a coram-nobis petition.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.