Carter v. State (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CaseAfter a jury trial, Petitioner was found guilty of aggravated robbery. Petitioner was sentenced to 360 months in prison. The court of appeals affirmed. Petitioner later filed a pro se petition to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court to consider a petition for writ of error coram nobis in the case, alleging that the State violated Brady v. Maryland. The Supreme Court denied the petition, concluding that the claims raised by Petitioner were challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence rather than a Brady violation. Now before the Supreme Court was Petitioner’s second coram nobis petition, in which he reiterated his Brady claim. The Supreme Court denied the petition, holding, as with the first petition, that Petitioner failed to establish a ground to issue a writ of error coram nobis.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.