Anderson v. Kelley (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CaseAppellant was convicted of rape, residential burglary, and third-degree domestic battery. Appellant later filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging the judgment reflecting his criminal convictions, alleging that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to convict him because he was illegally arrested, that the information charging him was defective, and that no plea was entered before his trial. The circuit court dismissed the petition. The Supreme Court affirmed the circuit court’s order dismissing the petition for the writ, holding that, although Appellant may have raised issues on appeal that questioned the jurisdiction of the trial court, none of his allegations had merit, and the circuit court did not clearly err in finding that Appellant’s petition did not set forth the required probable cause.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.