Davis v. State (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CaseAppellant entered a negotiated plea of nolo contendere to manslaughter, manufacture of a controlled substance, abuse of a corpse, and tampering with physical evidence. Appellant later filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus, alleging that he received ineffective assistance of counsel when he entered his plea of nolo contendere. The circuit court dismissed the petition with prejudice. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the circuit court correctly dismissed the petition because Appellant failed to demonstrate that the trial court in his case did not have subject matter jurisdiction or that the judgment was invalid on its face.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.