Griffis v. Hobbs (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CaseIn 2005, Appellant entered pleas of guilty or nolo contendere to six counts of attempted capital murder and one count of arson. In 2014, Appellant filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus, alleging that the trial court lacked jurisdiction in his case and that the judgment was illegal on numerous grounds. The petition was dismissed. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the circuit court did not err when it denied the petition, as Appellant did not establish the facial invalidity of the judgment or demonstrate a lack of the trial court’s jurisdiction.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.