Roberts v. Chandler (Per Curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Cite as 2015 Ark. 47 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-14-1089 Opinion Delivered February DERRICK ROBERTS PETITIONER V. HONORABLE LARRY CHANDLER, CIRCUIT JUDGE RESPONDENT 12, 2015 PRO SE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS [COLUMBIA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, NO. 14CR-09-113] PETITION MOOT. PER CURIAM Now before us is a pro se petition for writ of mandamus filed here on December 17, 2014, by petitioner Derrick Roberts. On January 14, 2014, petitioner filed in the Columbia County Circuit Court a pro se petition for writ of error coram nobis. In the mandamus petition, petitioner seeks to have Circuit Judge Larry Chandler enter a final order on the coram-nobis petition. On December 23, 2014, Judge Chandler timely filed a response to the petition in which he stated that he was retiring from the bench on December 31, 2014, at which time the coramnobis petition would be reassigned. Because the respondent, as of the date of this opinion, is no longer responsible for acting on petitioner’s pending pleading, this mandamus action is moot. Nevertheless, we take this opportunity to note that petitioner’s coram-nobis petition has been pending for more than one year. The reassignment process, if it has not already been completed, should be carried out promptly so that action can be taken on the pleading. The prompt resolution of all matters before a court is vital to the administration of justice. McNichols v. Elmore, 2014 Ark. 133 (per curiam). Cite as 2015 Ark. 47 Petition moot. Derrick Roberts, pro se petitioner. Dustin McDaniel, Att’y Gen., by: Rebecca Kane, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
