Chatmon v. State (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CasePetitioner was convicted on three counts of aggravated robbery and one count of theft of property. Petitioner was sentenced to an aggregate term of three consecutive life sentences plus 360 months’ imprisonment. Here, Petitioner filed a pro se petition and an amended petition seeking to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court to proceed with a petition for writ of error coram nobis, alleging that the judge in his case was biased and that the prosecutor engaged in impermissible misconduct. The Supreme Court denied the petitions, holding (1) Petitioner did not make the necessary showing of fundamental error to support relief where there was no demonstration of actual bias; and (2) Petitioner’s allegations of prosecutorial misconduct were either conclusory or were not the type that provide grounds for the writ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.