Davis v. Hobbs (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CaseAfter a jury trial, Appellant was found guilty of first-degree murder and sentenced as a habitual offender to life imprisonment. The Supreme Court affirmed. Appellant subsequently filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus, contending that his sentence was unconstitutional because the trial court admitted his prior juvenile-delinquency adjudication during the sentencing phase as a basis for sentencing him as a habitual offender. The circuit court denied habeas relief. The Supreme Court dismissed Appellant’s appeal without addressing whether Appellant stated a cognizable claim for habeas relief, as it was apparent on the record that prior felony convictions, not juvenile-delinquency adjudications, were used in sentencing Appellant as a habitual offender.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.