Davis v. Deen (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CaseIn 2006, Appellant was found guilty of first-degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. In 2010, Appellant sent two letters to Thomas Deen, the prosecuting attorney, requesting that he permit the custodian of records for the crime lab to release, pursuant to the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act, documentation of testing performed on hairs recovered from the body of the victim in his criminal case. The prosecuting attorney did not respond. In 2012, Appellant filed a petition for writ of mandamus against Deen requesting an order directing Deen to give the crime lab permission to release the information. The circuit court dismissed the petition, concluding that Appellant had no legal right to the requested information. The Supreme Court reversed, holding that a defendant has a right to access all records pertaining to his criminal case and that the crime laboratory is required to disclose to a defendant all evidence in the defendant’s case that is retained by the laboratory.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.