McClanton v. State (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CaseIn 2005, Appellant pleaded guilty to the sale or delivery of a controlled substance. Appellant was sentenced to a term of imprisonment and an additional suspended sentence. In 2012, Appellant pleaded guilty to having violated the terms of the suspended sentence and also entered guilty pleas to crimes entered in a separate case. Appellant was sentenced to a term of imprisonment and to a suspended sentence. In 2014, Appellant filed a petition pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. 16-90-111 to correct the sentence imposed in 2012 on revocation of the suspended 2005 sentence, alleging, inter alia, that the evidence was not sufficient to sustain the judgment of conviction. The trial court denied the petition. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the petition was not timely filed, and therefore, the trial court and appellate court lacked jurisdiction to grant the relief sought.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.