Thomas v. State (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CaseAfter a jury trial, Appellant was found guilty of aggravated robbery and commercial burglary and sentenced to an aggregate term of 240 months’ imprisonment. Appellant subsequently filed a pro se petition for postconviction relief, alleging that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance and that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the convictions. The trial court denied the petition. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and mooted the motion Appellant filed in relation to the appeal, holding that the trial court did not clearly err in concluding that trial counsel’s performance was not ineffective.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.