Pitts v. State (Per Curiam, with Dissenting)
Annotate this CaseAfter a jury trial, Petitioner was found guilty of second-degree sexual assault and sexual indecency with a child. The court of appeals affirmed. Petitioner subsequently filed a pro se petition to reinvest jurisdiction in the circuit court to consider a petition for writ of error coram nobis, asserting several grounds for the writ. The Supreme Court denied the petition, holding that not only did Petitioner not present sufficient grounds to support issuance or the writ, but his failure to act with due diligence, alone, would constitute good cause to deny the petition.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.