Pitts v. State (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CaseIn 2006, Appellant was found guilty of second-degree sexual assault and sexual indecency with a child. The court of appeals affirmed. In 2014, Appellant filed in the Supreme Court a pro se petition to reinvest jurisdiction in the circuit court to consider a petition for writ of error coram nobis. The Court denied the petition. Prior to the disposition of the petition, Appellant filed the instant second pro se petition to reinvest jurisdiction in the circuit court to consider a petition for writ of error coram nobis, as well as a pro se petition for leave to file an amended petition. The Supreme Court denied the petition and motion, holding that Petitioner failed to raise any cognizable claims that would support issuance of a writ of error coram nobis.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.