Chestang v. State (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CaseAfter a jury trial, Petitioner was found guilty of aggravated robbery and sentenced to 240 months’ imprisonment. The court of appeals affirmed. Petitioner filed a pro se petition in the Supreme Court requesting that jurisdiction be reinvested in the trial court so that he may proceed with a petition for writ of error coram nobis, contending that the prosecution withheld evidence from the jury that was contained in the probable cause affidavit. The Supreme Court denied the petition, holding that Petitioner failed to establish a Brady violation with respect to the probable cause affidavit.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.