Patrick v. State (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CaseAfter a jury trial, Petitioner was found guilty of rape and terroristic threatening in the first degree. The court of appeals affirmed. Petitioner subsequently filed a petition requesting that jurisdiction be reinvested in the trial court so that he may proceed with a petition for writ of error coram nobis, alleging in relevant part that the State withheld exculpatory evidence from the defense in violation of Brady v. Maryland. The Supreme Court denied the petition, holding (1) Petitioner did not meet his burden of demonstrating a ground for the writ; and (2) Petitioner did not establish that he exercised due diligence in bringing forth his claims for relief.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.