Hale v. State (Per Curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Cite as 2013 Ark. 470 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-13-499 Opinion Delivered BILLY RAY HALE APPELLANT November 14, 2013 PRO SE MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND MOTION TO FILE BELATED REPLY BRIEF, 39CV-13-12 [LEE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, 39CV-13-12, HON. L.T. SIMES, JUDGE] v. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL GRANTED; MOTION TO FILE BELATED REPLY BRIEF MOOT. PER CURIAM Appellant Billy Ray Hale has lodged an appeal in this court from an order of the circuit court denying his pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus. Now before us are appellant s pro se motions for appointment of counsel and to file a belated reply brief. We find good cause to grant the motion for appointment of counsel and appoint Misty Borkowski. Our clerk is directed to set a new briefing schedule for the appeal. As counsel has been appointed, the motion to file belated reply brief is moot. Motion for appointment of counsel granted; motion to file belated reply brief moot. Billy R. Hale, pro se appellant.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
