Hall v. Hall (Majority, with Dissenting)
Annotate this CaseTammye and Justin were divorced in 2010 by way of a consent divorce decree that included a property-settlement agreement. In 2011, Tammye filed a motion to increase child support, asserting that there had been a material increase in Justin's income, or alternatively, that the original child-support award had been based on figures fraudulently provided by Justin. Although the circuit court discovered assets hidden by Justin at the time of the original award, the court denied Tammye's motion. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding (1) the circuit court misstated the law when denying Tammye's motion, but the court's erroneous statement of the law was not the sole basis for the circuit court's denial of Tammye's motion; and (2) the circuit court did not err in denying the motion.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.